- Sergey Rosedkin -
		p r about z and
	Main | News | Cut-away | fotobio | Prose | About Dostoevsky | J. Roberts | Humour | Non-fikshn | Criticism | Virgin Pussy
THE CLAIM P. 5	7. Well very world court! I will remind to start themes who has forgotten, and I will inform those who did not know, that the Law «About world judges in the Russian Federation» has been accepted in November, 1998. This event has as though returned us to legal traditions of Russia of second half XIX century when as a result of judicial reform there were world courts, kakovye, on expression of then Minister of Justice Zamjatnina, should become a corner stone of public, fast, right and mercy court. I have not found «world court» in dictionary Dalja of the term-concept, and at Ozhegova the explanatory is given such — pre-revolutionary court for analysis small civil and criminal cases. And in present — XXI th — to world court too have got rid a century of all "trifle": receivership proceeding under claims to five hundred minimum wage rates, divorce, purpose of the alimony, administrative infringements, labour disputes, road and transport affairs, other in the same spirit and at last criminal cases with term of punishment till 3th years of imprisonment — slander, insults, a beating, small hooliganism … Clearly, that the term it has occurred from words "world", to "reconcile" and the main problem-function of world court — to try not to finish business to a sentence, and as soon as possible to finish it amicably, reconciliation of claimants-respondents. Akkurat on 2nd of April when the regional court has definitively torn down Ulyanovs-Syskunovyh expectations, trying to legalise lawless assignment of the general corridor, I have received the summons from world judge Fominoj with the offer to be to it in day «on conversation». Well, why and not to talk to the clever woman. If it, of course, the clever. As the copy of absolutely silly piece of paper signed by citizen Uljanovoj has been enclosed to the invitation, under the name — The complaint as private charge On November, 23rd, 2002 at 18 o'clock 30 minutes I left in a corridor of the general using, where I live to learn about what talk left earlier my husband Syskunov Timothy Borisovich and mine neighbour Rosedkin Sergey Nikolaevich. When I have asked: «What's happened?», — during this moment Rosedkin Sergey Nikolaevich has scattered to me in the person from gas ballonchika, thereby having caused to me a physical pain. Within 40 minutes I felt a headache, a sharp pain in eyes and at me breath because of what it was necessary to call «the first help» has been complicated. I consider, that the structure of penal act is seen in Rosedkina Sergey Nikolaevicha's actions, namely — fulfilment of the violent actions which have caused a physical pain, provided by article 116 UK the Russian Federation … Spelling and punctuation in this manuscript I, poeliku am possible, have corrected, but all crazy essence have left in its true beauty. Also has hastened in court — it is necessary also to it to explain absurd of imaginations-charges of my "poisoned" neigbour. Except world judge Fominoj (the strong thickset woman zabalzakovskogo age with a red permanent wave and with the press of unsuccessful private life on strong plastered person) I have found in its office and wonderfully recovered citizen Ulyanov. Our "conversation" already has soon started to accept strange enough character. Tamara Moiseevna pictured to Tatyana Karpovne (judge) about what I the malicious person whom I the spiteful writer as I do not like all, hate, envy all and unjustly I bear malice … Fomina sympathetically nodded a head and regretfully at me glanced. Have given-have given a word and me, but it was there and then found out, that about ill-starred partitions message speech is impossible, as they, ostensibly, no any relation to collision-quarrel have, with them understood federal (that is regional) court, and at us here the main thing — ballonchik with gas and "pshik" from it in the person to unfortunate Tamara Moiseevne … is clear, that I tried to argue-protest, tried to convince the woman of a permanent wave, that "pshik" from ballonchika (and at all in the person, and at all on Tamara Moiseevnu!) is a consequence wearisome peregorodochnoj fights, pressed-pressed on logic and common sense … Demon-lez th! After that the judge has started the main duty: she (addressing for some reason only to me) has suggested the conflicting parties to reconcile, and for this purpose I should neither much nor to be sorry at the lovely neigbour a little and to promise is oath, that it is more with it than quarrels I will never start … Naturally, with Uljanovoj I have resolutely refused reconciliatory embraces-kisses and, breaking a taboo, have assured publicly, that if it, Tamara Moiseevna, hopes such by to save rubbishy (it about itself has been said) partitions, she very much is mistaken. On that also have left. While. Before session of court which has been appointed to 11th April. By the way, judge Fomina even has not given a hint at my counter claim-statement which the militia should forward to court. Not delaying, I have run to search for its traces. It was found out, that tsidulja washing has reached and is at Fominoj, but as to me have prompted in office, it is necessary to make still two tsiduli: the statement for consideration of this my statement and objection on complaint Uljanovoj. That I also have made. To the world judge of a judicial site № 3 Lenin area of of Tambov of Fominoj T.K . From Rosedkina Sergey Nikolaevicha, Living (address) The statement Already more than 4th years between our family and owners sq. 92 (Ulyanov T. M, Syskunov T. B  ) there are the aversions, arisen that Ulyanovs-Syskunovy, having stolen at neighbours the most part of the general corridor (on 6 apartments), in a pointed manner refuse to return it though was already two decisions of Lenin regional court (from March, 12th, 1999 and on February, 12th, 2003 ), and thus terrorise neighbours: switch off light in the rest of the general corridor at own discretion, drive on a corridor the dog without a muzzle and so forth the suit beginnings right after on a pulling down of illegal partitions have begun in our apartment night calls with threats in my address. In a kind of it in June, 1999 I have got for 50 roubles in shop "Hunter" freely sold gas ballonchik "Shock" for self-defence. Trying to counteract hooliganism of neighbours, I have hung out at my door, on a wall of my apartment a poster-request «Light not to extinguish!», however gr. Syskunov it has shamelessly broken, as well as the subsequent. And here on November, 23rd, 2002 , when I 10th (the tenth!) The poster has been compelled to hang up already on an illegal partition in our corridor, approximately in 18-30 evenings sharp exacting calls to our door were distributed. When I have opened, into my apartment have rushed with dirty curses gr. Syskunov, has thrown to me in the person the crumpled poster and has rushed on me with fists. With a view of SELF-DEFENSE (item 37 UK the Russian Federation) me should be applied gas ballonchik — once "pshiknut". Syskunov has been compelled to recede, here still his wife Ulyanov has jumped out of the door, has started to bring to reason as though it, but Syskunov, not daring to come nearer to ballonchiku, has passed to threats and dirty insults so, as he said, «to live to me there was not for long», «it me uroet», "will kill", etc . And, he addressed to me on "you", "reptile", "goat", as if we with it the squabbled friends-friends. But the history and on it has not ended. While we discussed with my to death frightened wife, whether it is necessary to us to call in militia, — the new call to a door was distributed and there was a captain of militia Pervushkin N. N  accompanied two more militiamen. It has appeared, they have arrived on a call all the same ungirdled Ulyanovs-Syskunovyh. The captain has made reports in which has fixed ours with the wife of the indication upon hooliganism Syskunova, and has withdrawn from me ballonchik with gas for examination. On December, 4th, 2002 I have handed in the statement addressed to the chief Lenin ROVD Baranova about attraction of hooligans-neighbours from 92nd sq. to responsibility for the given incident. On December, 19th, 2002 the item l-t Jokers A, understanding with the statement, has sent it in Lenin world court as the statement of claim for consideration on a being (ref. № Н-4). In office of Lenin world court it is registered on December, 23rd, 2002 Since then any data on destiny of the statement I did not receive. Meanwhile Ulyanovs-Syskunovy after 4 (four) months after incident and after 3 (three) months after registration of my statement in Leninsk world court have submitted on March, 31st, 2003 slanderous «the Complaint as private charge», having perverted the facts of the incident which has happened on November, 23rd, 2002 , and accusing me in an unmotivated attack on them. This statement was for some reason accepted to immediate consideration, and court session is appointed to April, 11th, 2002  In connection with the above-stated I ask: 1) My statement from December, 4th, 2002 and statement Uljanovoj from March, 31st, 2003 to consider simultaneously during one judicial session as it is two statements of conflicting parties for the same collision-incident. 2) If it for any reasons is impossible, I ask to consider the FIRST my statement, as submitted and registered considerably before the adversary statement. 3) I Ask to understand in line of duty why my statement since December, 23rd, 2003 laid in Leninsk world court without movement. The second document poluchilsja-was looked, in my opinion, even more convincingly: Objections on «the Complaint as private charge» ULJANOVOJ T. M. On March, 31st, 2003 Ulyanov T. M has submitted to world court of Lenin area slanderous «the Complaint as private charge» in which has perverted the facts of the incident which has happened on November, 23rd, 2002  Namely: 1) She informs, that left in a corridor of the general using to learn, about what her husband Syskunov who has left earlier and neighbour Rosedkin talks, and during this moment Rosedkin has ostensibly scattered to it in the person from gas ballonchika. That is, gr. Ulyanov asserts, that we with Syskunovym peacefully talked (discussed, let us assume, football news and told each other jokes) and when it has appeared from the doors, I suddenly have unexpectedly snatched on it and pshiknul gas from ballonchika in the person, having caused «a physical pain» … actions of the person who is in a sharp attack of madness or in extreme degree of intoxication Here are obviously described. I think, both Ulyanovs-Syskunovy, and witnesses (my wife Rosedkina T. M, captain Pervushkin N. N  and two militiamen who were with it) will confirm, that neither mad, nor drunk I that evening was not. 2) Gas ballonchik "Shock" freely is on sale in shops as self-defence means, action of gas after application stops in 20 minutes and for health it does not represent any serious consequences. I have forcedly applied it to self-defence against Syskunova which has rushed into my apartment and have snatched on me with threats and fists. "Pshiknul" I once while itself was in a hall of the apartment, and Syskunov, hardly having receded, was at a threshold of my apartment in a corridor. During this moment also has appeared from Ulyanov's doors. Between our doors distance of 4 (FOUR) metres, meanwhile, an operative range ballonchika "Shock" ONLY TO 2,5 (TWO And a half) metres, and more or less seriously it operates on distance TO 1 (ONE) metre. It is accurately specified on most ballonchike, withdrawn at me captain Pervushkinym for examination. So could not gr in any way. Ulyanov to feel «a physical pain», especially "sharp" and so forth « Agonal »symptoms. 3) Moreover, Ulyanov could not feel gas influence from this ballonchika AT ALL as I have got it in shop "Hunter" for 50 roubles in June, 1999 when after the beginning of disputed relations with Ulyanovs-Syskunovymi to me have started to threaten with punishment by phone. Working life gas ballonchika — 2 (two) years so in day of application on November, 23rd, 2003 already more than 2 (TWO) years as working life has expired it (that can confirm captain Pervushkin and results of examination), and actually it was same safe and harmless, as osvezhitel air. And itself Ulyanov on preliminary conversation at the judge on April, 4th, 2003 repeatedly and fairly underlined, that on Syskunova gas at all has not worked, though Syskunov in any case was to our door more close, than Ulyanov. In such a manner that and as did Ulyanov with the person before the reference to doctors if on him any traces of the influence were really appreciable, what deodorant or antistatic — Ulyanovs-Syskunovy know only. 4) It is thought still, that if Ulyanov's what miracle indeed has seriously suffered from gas in the evening on November, 23rd, 2002 , she would address in court already next day. Why Ulyanovs-Syskunovy have made "complaint" after 4 (four) months after incident? It is possible to explain it only to that on February, 12th, 2003 the Lenin regional court has once again passed already the second decision (the first was on March, 12th, 1999 ) about a pulling down of illegal partitions and returning to neighbours of the general corridor stolen by Ulyanovs-Syskunovymi so by means of world court respondents Ulyanovs-Syskunovy try to blackmail me now as the claimant that I did not insist on execution of the decision of Lenin regional court. 5) Calls bewilderment and that fact does not give in to any logic explanation, that, in essence, the same Lenin court accepts to consideration the complaint-claim from gr. Uljanovoj which is demonstrative more than four years refused to execute the decision of Lenin court from March, 12th, 1999 and a second month also execution of the new decision of Lenin court from February, 12th, 2003 in a pointed manner sabotages  In connection with the above-stated I ask to state a corresponding estimation "complaint" Uljanovoj from March, 31st, 2003 and to consider the problem on attraction gr. Uljanovoj to the criminal liability for slander and the insults dishonouring mine honour and advantage. I am known enough as the writer and the journalist not only in Baranove, but also behind its limits (my books are published in Moscow, abroad), I am held in respect as the person working on increase of cultural image Baranovshchiny and at all it is not pleasant to me, that, to put it mildly, dishonourable people like Ulyanovs-Syskunovyh can me not only rob, plunder, terrorise, intimidate, blackmail, but still after that me and to expose the madman, the maniac, the hooligan moreover by fabrications to bring me under a category "accused" and «the criminal defendant». And if tomorrow it will come in a head to accuse me without adducing any proof of attempt of rape or attempt at a life? I ask and consider, that my statement on Ulyanovs-Syskunovyh hooligan actions is in Leninsk world court since December, 23rd, 2002 without consideration. But on 11th of April it was quickly found out, that my "petitions" like far not to all. For example, same judge Fominoj. It there and then categorically and at all, and without special explanations, has rejected the request for consideration of my counter claim, and in my "objections" it terribly did not like the request-offer «about attraction gr. Uljanovoj to the criminal liability for slander and insults», and it (judge) has threatened to turn also this paper if I do not add with its kind phrase: say, from suit gr. Uljanovoj for slander I refuse … Alas, I have given in on pressure — have written-has added. Here again by itself the GOOD ADVICE has ripened: in no event it is impossible to give in to pressure of the judge, refusing to accept to consideration your lawful statements and-or forcing to change-deform their essence; there and then demand a written substantiation in refusal and immediately address in higher judicial instances, and it is even better — in Office of Public Prosecutor. From the first steps of judicial action having given in to unreasonable pressure of court or an adversary, you here immediately will start to lose process morally, and then, it is possible not to doubt, will lose and actually. On it, the first, session there was also the young bright fellow, appeared the new lawyer istitsy. Most likely for it (witnesses — my wife, Syskunov and the captain of militia Pervushkin — waited for a call in a corridor) all circumstances of business have been repeated, and then reports, the statement and inquiry Uljanovoj from station of the first help are read. It, this inquiry, was rather cool: it is given out for some reason only on November, 25th (for the third day after incident) and appeared in it, that the doctor who has arrived on a call has found out in citizen Uljanovoj reddening of a skin and slezotechenie, that could be «reaction to unknown aerosol substance» and the trace had been entered the diagnosis: «an osteochondrosis of cervical department of a backbone» (?!). As to reports I have with satisfaction noticed, that in the militian report of withdrawal at me gas ballonchika is noted-is accurately fixed: term of its validity has expired for a long time. And as a paper from ekspertno-kriminalisticheskogo managements quite fairly affirmed: Results of the carried out research testify to presence in the presented substance (from ballonchika "Shock" — N. N) kapsaitsina — an extract of siliculose pepper which neither to strong, nor to poisonous substances does not concern. And the conclusion in the certificate of a forensic medical examination which Ulyanov has passed for some reason only for 6th day after ill-starred "pshika", at a sight of any sane person, testified quite in my advantage. 1. According to data meddokumentatsii (? — N. N), at Uljanovoj are revealed puffiness of the person, giperemija (reddening) of mucous membranes of eyes, slezotechenie. It is a consequence of influence of irritating substances, is possible (! — N. N), from gas ballonchika on November, 23rd, 2002  2. The given physical injuries have not caused short-term frustration of health or insignificant proof general work capacity (as harm to health is not qualified). Besides it was available also the strange inquiry from hospital any again as if Ulyanov it is out-patient was treated at them from November, 27th till December, 3rd all for same "osteochondrosis" (which, as is known, arises from an inactive way of life, and at all from influence of any gases). Having read all these pieces of paper-documents, Tatyana Karpovna has called by turns our witnesses, has listened to them, then has once again suggested me to reconcile with dear Tamara Moiseevnoj to (be sorry), having listened to my categorical refusal, she has as though heaved a deep sigh and has appointed a new court to April, 23rd, thus (I at first to the ears have not believed!) has ordered to me to bring-show to characteristic court on me from … the Union of writers and from neighbours. Mum mia! Here it appears to what shkolnichestva it is necessary to be reached-fall … Easy consolation of this judicial-farcical day was that in a mail box I have found out an envelope with a stamp of division of judicial police officers and quite remarkable paper. THE DECISION About excitation of executive manufacture … Being guided by item 2 of item 9 of the Federal law «About executive manufacture», the judicial police officer-executor Veretyonkina O. A  has decided: 1. To excite executive manufacture concerning debtor Uljanovoj Tamara Moiseevny. 2. To the debtor within 5 days from the date of excitation of executive manufacture I suggest to take down voluntary autocratically erected partitions to sq. № 92 in the house № 54 on street International in a corridor of the general using which to result in a former condition. In case of default by the debtor of requirements of the executive document without valid excuse in time, established for their voluntary execution, the judicial police officer-executor carries out compulsory execution executive (Alas, style is that in these circles! — N. N) the document the decision about collecting from the debtor of executive gathering and expenses on fulfilment of executive actions … also is taken out The decision about excitation of executive manufacture can be appealed against in corresponding court on the location of the judicial police officer-executor in 10-day term from the date of decision removal. Well here, it was prematurely thought, is, there is a truth on the earth!. However, we will not hurry up and we will finish world court. Clearly, that on me, as usual, it was necessary to write-compose characteristics to me. Neighbours from 94th and 166th apartments, and also baranovsky litvozhd the signatures have put ours with hunting: sincerely agreeing, on the one hand, with everything, that there has been written, and with another, with gratitude to me, that has not forced, has not asked them to write these papers personally. And characteristics, it is necessary to recognise, have turned out nice enough. Judge Fomina has read them aloud, having learnt itself thus and having informed participants of process, that I «the intelligent, formed person, the known writer and the journalist», that I «am polite and precautionary with neighbours», that I «conduct a healthy way of life», that at me «good family relations with the wife» and that at me, at last, are «bright positive line — aspiration to justice» … It are neighbours. And the chairman of the literary organisation, in turn, has explained to court, that a member of the Union of writers of Russia Rosedkin — «The author of eight books which have left in basic in the Moscow, by right is the leader of the Tambov literature, the only thing from local writers which the editions-publications in capitals, abroad, on the Internet (where it has also a personal site) supports image not only baranovskoj literatures, but also the cities of Baranova as the cultural centre, Baranovshchiny as region with high level of culture. Its name is widely known to fans of the literature. Such people as the known writer and journalist N.N.Rosedkin , is proud our Baranovsky earth …» And further Dignity Sanych, ours pispredsedatel, has already personally added from itself, that « Writer N.N.Rosedkin in a life the person modest, conducts a healthy way of life (does not drink, does not smoke, it is morally steady), uses the deserved respect of companions on a feather …» To characteristics was and the cutting from a hot of the local newspaper where on all strip very "honey" sketch to my 50 anniversary coming literally through two day flaunted about me well is enclosed. And the sketch anniversary with expression has been read by Tatyana Karpovnoj. However, at times it did wrong, absolutely inconceivable accents in words, but a general impression, I think, it has not spoilt. And it is valid, it is necessary to recognise, characteristics (and especially a sketch) have made strong impression on court and an adversary. The sight of judge Fominoj has obviously become warmer and even was filled, as it seemed to me, any shade-shine of respect for me, and the lawyer of a devil … (fie, I wished to tell — Uljanovoj) there and then has with great feeling protested against their familiarising with court materials, for what such reason I to admit, and has not comprehended. However Tatyana Karpovna to business has attached characteristics-sketches and has there and then added a spoon whether honey, whether tar: has read aloud two inquiries — from narcological and psihdispansera. Unpleasantly, of course, that such inquiries, moreover behind your back on you request, but it is good though and even nicely to learn, that you, it appears, in these gloomy institutions on the account do not stand … And on those thanks! On the given note the court that day also has ended, for the lawyer istitsy, probably, being afraid of favorable influence on court of my characteristics and inquiries, and also obviously wishing to pull time, has persistently asked to invite in court of one more well very important witness — vrachihu the "first aid" which has rescued its patient that ill-starred evening from «gas death». In two weeks, on May, 7th, witness Zaharkina (the young woman), for some reason terribly worrying already to crimson stains on cheeks, has told to court that is good and even perfectly remembers, how it, having arrived on a call, has found unfortunate to Ulyanov in a terrible condition: at it were observed «crimson stains on cheeks, osiplost voices, dry barking cough, slezotechenie» … to Indications of the witness perfectly remembering details of a call and a condition of the "barking" patient whole five and a half months, the price would not be, but after all here in what zakavyka: on my specifying questions — what number it has occurred also what calls (and them, as she said, happens not less than 15-20 for change), it has still remembered what patients of that day? — Awfully nervous young woman could not answer … Something with its memory became! I sat, almost not listening the lawyer, something broadcasting trace, and reflected on in how much have managed Uljanovoj selectivity of memory of this nice and, judging by the flaring person, yet not absolutely lost conscience of the woman … When last word has been given me, I, on my understanding, have very convincingly, logically and victoriously explained, that has put as clear as day: all testimony can be treated 50 on 50 — and in advantage istitsy, and in favour of the respondent, but it is necessary to consider, that at Uljanovoj available there are only any doubtful inquiries, and at me — the facts, the facts, one only the facts. Verdict announcement has been appointed to May, 12th. Has put it — sentence drawing up — as it has appeared, serious, demands preparation, reflexions, possibly, consultations, well and, it is not excluded, specifications about the sizes of any bonus and other thin matters … By itself, it only my guesses-assumptions. I admit (though it is a shame to me to admit it!), on announcement of a sentence I went in the vigorous mood, assured almost on all hundred in the victory. Therefore I wish to give for the same naive people the next GOOD ADVICE: till the moment of announcement of a verdict in no event it is impossible to be assured of a victory — then if the court decision is in your advantage, you will test pleasure doubly and if will hear from lips of the judge, that have lost — the bitterness and insult any more will not be such sharp. At me the tone at auscultation of "my" sentence has started to go down very soon and to the ending-conclusion has reached a minus point. I think, first of all for those lucky beggars who never happened in a role accused, it is necessary to quote-present here at least a cap and a final part of it enough specific and in something very much and very oppressive document from the judicial-criminal world. SENTENCE Name of the Russian Federation Of Rams on May, 12th, 2003 The world judge of a judicial site № 3 Lenin areas of Baranova Fomina T. K  with participation of defendant Rosedkina N. N  , at secretary Uklejkinoj N. P , and also private accuser-victim Uljanovoj T. M  , the representative of the victim of the lawyer Syomkina V. A  . … having considered materials of criminal case concerning Rosedkina Sergey Nikolaevicha (date, the birthplace, a residence permit and so forth), earlier not sudimogo, a crime accused of fulfilment provided by item 116 UK the Russian Federation HAS ESTABLISHED: (Further indications-versions of all participants of process of m are retold in detail enough the conclusion) follows … Statements of defendant Rosedkina N. N  and witness Rosedkinoj T. M  , that it operated with a view of self-defence, the gas stream has been directed on Syskunova T. B  , instead of on Ulyanov T. M are denied by proofs on business: indications of witnesses, the survey certificate. Witnesses have explained, that at the victim signs peculiar for reaction to aerosol substance took place. Statements of defendant Rosedkina N. N  and witness Rosedkinoj T. M  that at anybody from present at quarrel and during use gas ballonchika there have not come any consequences as at Uljanovoj T. M  , hence damages at it have arisen under other circumstances, are insolvent, as the gas stream has been directed Rosedkinym from itself and after that it has closed at once a door. Witness Syskunov at the moment of application gas ballonchika has already turned to leave from apartment Rosedkinyh and consequently gas has got on clothes. One Ulyanov stood faced to Rosedkinu, received Uljanovoj damages testify to an orientation of a stream of gas … Arguments of the defendant about impossibility of harmful influence of gas on Ulyanov in view of the validity expiry of the term ballonchika, since cannot be taken into consideration . They are insolvent. Working life gas ballonchika is term, on which the manufacturer guarantees properties of gas that does not exclude possibility of its harmful influence on a human body (as it is visible, the judge at all does not know or has meaningly forgotten article about an innocence presumption! — N. N). Actions of defendant Rosedkina N. N  the court qualifies under item 116 UK the Russian Federation — fulfilment of other violent actions which have caused a physical pain, but not entailed consequences specified in item 115 UK the Russian Federation. At election of punishment the court takes into consideration, that defendant Rosedkin N. N  earlier we do not judge, is characterised from a positive side, heavy consequences for health of the victim has not come, the crime for which Rosedkin N. N  is made answerable, concerns a category of crimes of small weight that recognises as the circumstances commuting punishment. The circumstances aggravating punishment, in court it has not been established. On the basis of stated, being guided by item 304, 307-308 UPK the Russian Federation, the world judge HAS SENTENCED: To recognise Rosedkina Sergey Nikolaevicha as guilty of fulfilment of the crime provided by item 116 UK the Russian Federation, and to appoint to it punishment in the form of the penalty at a rate of 25 minimum wage rates that there correspond 2500 rbl. in the state income. The sentence can be appealed against in an appeal order in Lenin regional court of Baranova within 10 days from the date of its announcement. The person during this moment I, naturally, did not see, and fizii "victim" and its lawyer to describe I do not want. And so it is clear. <<<(P. 4) (P. 6)>>>
çç ● èè
© Rosedkin Sergey Nikolaevich, 2001
E-mail: emp-reports@fustercluck.com